How to Tell Whether an AI Candidate Has Built Something That Works

An AI engineer’s CV says they built a chatbot, deployed a model and improved accuracy. The projects sound impressive. But what did the candidate personally do—and did the work solve a real problem?

As more companies hire for AI roles, those questions matter. A polished demo can show what a system does under ideal conditions. The job may require someone who can make it useful, reliable and maintainable when real users arrive.

Start with the Problem, Not the Tools

Before assessing candidates, the hiring team should define what the role will deliver. Is the person developing a prototype, improving an existing product or taking a system into production?

The answer changes the skills required. Someone who is excellent at experimenting with models may not have experience monitoring a live system. Another candidate may be particularly strong at integrating AI into a product that customers use every day.

A clear brief helps interviewers ask about the right kind of work.

Ask What Happened After the Demo

A useful interview question is: “What happened when people started using it?”

Ask the candidate how they measured whether the system helped. What mistakes did it make? What feedback came from users? How did the team respond when the output was wrong or the system became slow or expensive to run?

Strong candidates should be able to discuss trade-offs as well as successes. They may describe a feature they simplified, an approach they abandoned or a manual check they kept because automation was not reliable enough. These details often reveal more than a list of model names.

Find Out What the Candidate Owned

AI projects are usually team efforts. One person may prepare data, another may develop the model, and others may handle integration, testing and deployment. That is normal. The interview should establish which decisions the candidate made and how they worked with the rest of the team.

Ask them to walk through one project from beginning to end. Where did their responsibility start and end? Which difficult decision did they make? What would they do differently now?

The goal is to understand their contribution, not to expect them to have built an entire system alone.

Use a Realistic Assessment

A short work discussion can be more useful than a generic technical test. Present a problem similar to one the company faces, along with limited information. Ask how the candidate would clarify the requirement, evaluate possible approaches and decide what to measure.

Pay attention to the questions they ask. Candidates who first want to understand users, data and the cost of errors may be better prepared for the work than those who immediately suggest a complex model.

At SilverPeople, we help companies define AI roles around the results they need, then assess candidates’ relevant work and decisions. That makes it easier to look beyond familiar keywords on a CV.

The best evidence of AI capability is not a demo alone. It is a clear account of what the candidate built, how it performed and what they learned when people used it.

Read more »

Your GCC Is Ready to Launch. Is Your Leadership Team?

 

The office is ready. The technology is being set up. The first hiring targets have been approved. For a company launching a Global Capability Centre (GCC) in India, these are visible signs of progress.

But one question can get less attention: Who will lead the centre when decisions need to be made locally?

A GCC may be expected to build teams quickly, deliver work for global stakeholders and eventually take on more complex responsibilities. Hiring employees before defining its leadership can leave those teams waiting for direction.

Define What the GCC Leader Will Own

“GCC Head” can mean different things to different companies. One organisation may need a leader to establish operations and meet initial hiring targets. Another may expect the person to build product or technology capabilities and influence decisions across the global business.

Before starting the search, the company should be clear about the role’s authority. Can the leader shape team structures? Will they influence which work moves to India? Who decides priorities when local and global stakeholders disagree?

Candidates need these answers too. A leader hired to build a strategic centre may struggle if the role turns out to be focused mainly on administration.

Hire Functional Leaders for the Work Ahead

The GCC head cannot build every capability alone. Depending on its purpose, the centre may need experienced leaders in engineering, data, finance, operations or people management.

It helps to plan these hires in sequence. A technology leader joining early can help define team requirements and assess specialist candidates. A people leader can build hiring and onboarding processes before recruitment reaches full pace. Waiting until dozens of employees have joined may make these gaps harder to fix.

The first leaders also set expectations for how the centre will work with the wider organisation. Their ability to communicate across teams and locations matters alongside their functional expertise.

Look Beyond Launch Experience

A candidate who has helped open a GCC may bring valuable experience, but launching a centre is only part of the job. The hiring team should ask what happened after the opening.

Did the candidate build managers who could lead independently? Did the centre take on more complex work? How were disagreements with global stakeholders resolved? What would the candidate do differently in a new launch?

These examples help distinguish someone who can meet an opening date from someone who can build a centre with lasting value.

Give Leaders Time to Prepare

If senior leaders join only weeks before the first large hiring wave, they have little opportunity to shape role briefs, interview standards or team structure. Bringing them in earlier allows them to take part in the decisions they will later be accountable for.

At SilverPeople, we see GCC hiring as a capability-building exercise. We help organisations identify the leaders and specialists needed for the work the centre will take on, then align recruitment with that plan.

A GCC launch is a beginning. The right leadership team helps determine what the centre can become after it opens.

next

Why GCCs Lose Strong Candidates Between the Final Interview and Offer

A candidate completes three interviews for a leadership role at a new Global Capability Centre (GCC). The conversations go well. The hiring team agrees that the person has the right experience.

Then the candidate waits.

The local team is ready to make an offer, but a global stakeholder wants another discussion. Compensation needs approval from a different team. Someone asks to compare one more candidate. By the time the decision is made, the preferred candidate has accepted another opportunity.

The search begins again, even though the right person may already have been found.

Too Many People Own the Decision

A GCC role often involves stakeholders in India and at headquarters. Their input is useful, especially when the new hire will work closely with global teams. Problems arise when nobody is clear about who makes the final decision.

Before interviewing candidates, the hiring team should agree on who assesses each capability, who must approve the hire and who can make the offer. Otherwise, every completed interview risks creating another round of internal discussion.

This clarity matters most for early leadership hires. Those vacancies can hold up the hiring of entire teams.

Interview Feedback Comes Too Late

A candidate should not have to wait a week to discover whether the company wants another conversation. Yet feedback can slow down when interviewers work across time zones and have competing priorities.

A simple process helps: schedule a short decision meeting when the interviews are booked, ask interviewers to record evidence against agreed criteria and give the candidate a clear date for the next update.

Quick feedback does not mean making a rushed decision. It means giving the decision the attention it needs while the conversation is still fresh.

The Offer Is Built After the Candidate Is Chosen

Some hiring teams wait until they select a candidate to discuss compensation, title or reporting structure internally. That can lead to delays or an offer that differs from what the candidate expected.

For a senior GCC role, these details should be discussed early. Recruiters need to understand the approved range and any flexibility before approaching candidates. They should also ask candidates about their expectations and reasons for considering a move. An offer is easier to close when both sides have been open throughout the process.

Candidates Need a Clear Picture of the GCC

A new centre can be an exciting opportunity, but candidates may also have questions. What work will the India team own? How much influence will local leaders have? What will success look like after the launch?

If different interviewers give different answers, confidence can fade even when the role itself is attractive. A shared, honest explanation of the GCC’s plans helps candidates decide whether they want to join.

At SilverPeople, we believe a strong GCC search needs both careful assessment and a clear route to a decision. We help hiring teams define roles, coordinate conversations and keep candidates informed as the process moves forward.

Finding the right candidate is only part of the work. GCCs must also be ready to make a timely, well-considered offer.

Read more »

Why Fast-Growing Commerce Companies Need Different Leaders at Different Stages

 

A leader who helps an e-commerce company grow from one city to five may be excellent at solving problems personally. They know the team, make quick decisions and step in whenever an order, supplier or customer issue needs attention.

As the company expands further, that same approach becomes harder to sustain. The leader cannot be present in every city or approve every decision. The business now needs clear processes, capable managers and ways to spot problems early.

This does not mean the original leader was the wrong hire. It means the job has changed.

Early Growth Rewards People Who Build

In an early-stage commerce business, responsibilities are rarely tidy. A category leader may speak directly with suppliers, review customer feedback and help resolve fulfilment issues. An operations leader may open locations while still managing daily performance.

People who succeed at this stage often work well with uncertainty. They can make decisions with limited information and build something before there is a complete playbook.

When recruiting, companies should ask for examples of what a candidate created from the ground up. Did they establish a process, hire a first team or solve a problem without a large support function?

Expansion Requires People Who Can Scale

Once the business has more locations, categories and employees, the challenge shifts. Leaders must help other people make good decisions consistently.

A Head of Operations may need to develop regional managers instead of managing every site directly. A supply chain leader may need to improve planning across the network rather than solve individual stock issues. A technology leader may need to build a team that can maintain a reliable platform while developing new features.

Hiring teams should look for evidence that a candidate has made this shift before. How did they delegate? Which measures did they use to understand performance? What did they change when a process that worked at a smaller scale began to fail?

The Brief Must Match the Next Stage

A common hiring mistake is to replace a departing leader with someone who has the same background, without asking what the business needs now.

Before opening a search, define the outcomes expected over the next year. Will the new leader launch cities, improve profitability, strengthen managers or make an existing network more reliable? Each goal points towards a different mix of experience.

The company should also be honest about what is already in place. A candidate who has scaled a mature business with strong systems may find it difficult to succeed if this role still requires them to build those systems.

Keep Valuable Leaders as Roles Evolve

Growth does not always require replacing people. Some leaders can develop with the business when they have support, clear expectations and strong managers around them. Others may be better suited to the stage they helped build.

At SilverPeople, we help commerce businesses define leadership roles around their next challenge. That makes the search more focused and gives candidates a clearer view of what success will require.

The right leader for growth is the person equipped for the stage the business is entering.

Read more »

Who Should You Hire Before Opening Your Next 50 Dark Stores?

 

A quick commerce company plans to open 50 dark stores. The hiring target is obvious at first: each store needs people to receive stock, pick orders and keep daily operations running.

But if the company waits until the launch schedule is final to recruit everyone else, it may find that the people responsible for making those stores work are missing. A store can open on time and still struggle with stock availability, inconsistent processes or managers who have had little preparation.

The hiring plan should begin with a different question: Who needs to be in place before the first new store opens?

Start with the Leaders Who Will Build the Network

A regional or city operations leader cannot be hired as an afterthought. This person may need to help select store managers, establish routines and respond when performance varies between locations.

For a 50-store expansion, the company should decide how many locations each leader can realistically support. That depends on geography, store maturity and the strength of the managers beneath them. One leader’s experience running a few established stores may not prove they can launch many new ones at once.

Interview questions should explore what candidates have built, how they prepared new managers and what they did when an opening did not go to plan.

Give Inventory and Supply Chain Clear Ownership

New stores need the right products in the right quantities. Too little stock frustrates customers; too much can tie up cash and create waste.

Before expansion, companies should assess whether their existing supply chain and inventory planning teams can support a larger network. They may need stronger leadership in demand planning, replenishment or supplier coordination. These roles can be less visible than store hiring, but their decisions affect every location.

Hire Store Managers Early Enough to Prepare Them

A store manager who joins days before opening has little time to learn the systems, train the team or identify problems in the setup. Recruiting managers earlier gives them a chance to understand operating standards and take part in launch preparation.

It also helps the company assess whether they can lead people, handle pressure and maintain accuracy when order volumes change. Experience alone is not enough; the work sample should resemble the conditions of the role.

Build a Hiring Plan Around the Launch Sequence

Opening 50 stores does not mean hiring for all 50 on the same day. A phased plan can show which leaders are needed first, when store managers should join and how frontline recruitment will follow.

This also gives recruiters time to build candidate pipelines instead of responding to each vacancy only when it becomes urgent.

At SilverPeople, we connect hiring plans with business expansion plans. For quick commerce companies, that means identifying the leadership and specialist roles that will support a launch, as well as the teams needed to run each location.

Opening stores is a milestone. Hiring the people who can make them perform is the real preparation for growth.

Read more »

The Fintech Hiring Brief That Looks Good on Paper but Misses the Right Candidates

 

A fintech company shares a hiring brief for a product leader. It asks for ten years of experience, a background in payments, time at a recognised brand and a record of launching products at scale.

The brief looks thorough. Recruiters know which CVs to search for, and the hiring team agrees on the requirements. Yet weeks later, the shortlist feels weak. Candidates who meet every condition are scarce, while several interesting profiles have been screened out.

The problem may be the brief itself. It describes where the ideal candidate has worked, but says little about what the person needs to accomplish.

Familiar Names Can Hide Important Differences

Two candidates may have the same title at similar fintech companies and have done very different jobs. One may have owned a product from idea to launch. The other may have improved a small part of a well-established platform.

Neither experience is automatically better. It depends on the work waiting for the new hire. If the company needs someone to build a product with limited resources, experience inside a large, well-supported team may not be the closest match.

A stronger brief explains the challenge: perhaps improving customer onboarding, building a new lending journey or leading a product team through a period of change. That gives recruiters something more useful to assess than a list of employer names.

“Must Have” Requirements Can Become Barriers

Industry experience can matter, particularly when a role requires detailed knowledge of a financial product. But hiring teams should examine each requirement before making it mandatory.

Could someone from insurance technology or another regulated product business bring relevant experience? Does the role truly require ten years of experience, or does the company need evidence that a candidate has led a team through two or three comparable challenges?

This does not mean lowering standards. It means setting standards that relate directly to success in the job.

Separate the Work from the Wish List

Before publishing a fintech hiring brief, ask the hiring manager to describe three outcomes expected in the first six to twelve months. Then work backwards:

• Which skills are essential to deliver those outcomes?
• Which experiences would help but could be learned?
• What decisions will the person own?
• What support will they have from other teams?

The result is a clearer brief for recruiters and a more honest opportunity for candidates. It can also reveal when the company has combined two different jobs into one vacancy.

Give Interviewers the Same Definition of Success

A better brief only helps if the interview process follows it. Each interviewer should know which capability they are assessing and ask candidates for examples of work they personally delivered.

At SilverPeople, we begin by understanding the business need behind a fintech role. That helps us identify candidates whose achievements match the challenge, including people whose career paths may look different from the original wish list.

A hiring brief should help you find the right person. If it only describes a familiar CV, it may cause you to miss them.

Read more »

Why Fintech Companies Struggle to Hire Leaders Who Understand Both Risk and Growth

 

A fintech company is ready to grow. It wants to launch a new product, reach more customers or enter another market. The leadership brief sounds straightforward: find someone who can scale the business.

Then the interviews begin. One candidate knows how to drive growth but has limited experience working within financial controls. Another understands risk deeply but has never led a business through rapid expansion. Both have impressive CVs. Neither is an obvious fit.

This is a common challenge in fintech leadership hiring: growth and risk cannot be treated as separate responsibilities.

The Brief Often Asks for Everything

Fintech leadership roles can become long lists of requirements: product knowledge, commercial judgment, compliance awareness, technology experience, partnerships and team leadership. When every skill is marked “essential,” the search becomes too narrow.

Before recruiting, the company needs to decide what the leader will actually own. Are they expected to grow an established product responsibly? Build a new one? Improve controls after a period of fast expansion? The answers determine which experience matters most.

A candidate does not need to have done every part of the job before. They do need the judgment to recognise when a growth decision creates a risk that must be addressed.

Industry Experience Is Only a Starting Point

Hiring someone from a bank, payments company or lending platform can provide useful context. But a familiar employer does not show how that person makes decisions.

Interviewers should ask for specific examples. When did the candidate slow or change a launch because of a concern? How did they work with product, compliance and commercial teams when priorities conflicted? What did they do when a growth target became difficult to meet?

These questions reveal far more than asking whether someone has “worked in fintech.”

The Company Must Be Clear About Authority

A leader cannot balance risk and growth if they are accountable for outcomes but have little influence over the decisions behind them. Candidates will want to understand who approves products, how concerns are raised and whether teams can challenge a proposed launch.

Clarity matters for the employer too. If several leaders believe they own the same decision, progress may slow. If nobody owns it, a problem may be missed.

Recruitment is an opportunity to define those responsibilities before someone joins.

Look for Collaborative Judgment

Strong fintech leaders do not need to be experts in every function. They need to know when to involve specialists, listen to evidence and make sound decisions with the team.

A realistic interview discussion can help. Give candidates a situation involving a promising growth opportunity and a potential operational or customer risk. Ask how they would investigate it, whom they would involve and what would guide their decision. There may be no single perfect answer, but their reasoning will be revealing.

At SilverPeople, we approach fintech leadership hiring by understanding the business goal behind the role and the decisions the person will need to make. That helps us look beyond titles and assess the experience that will matter in the job.

The right fintech leader can pursue growth while understanding what must be protected as the business scales.

Read more »

Hiring a Battery Team: Which Skills Must Be In-House?

 

A growing EV company needs battery expertise, but “hire a battery team” is rarely a simple instruction. The work may span cell selection, pack design, Battery Management Systems (BMS), testing, supplier quality, manufacturing and field performance. Hiring for all of it at once can be slow and expensive.

The better question is: Which decisions must our own team be able to make?

The answer depends on what the company designs, builds and buys from suppliers. It also changes as a product moves from development into production.

Start with Product Ownership

Suppose a company buys cells from a supplier but designs its own battery packs. It may not need a large in-house cell chemistry team. It does, however, need people who can set pack requirements, understand cell behaviour, assess safety risks and challenge supplier claims.

If the company also develops its own BMS, it needs stronger in-house capability across electronics, embedded software and controls. These specialists must work closely with pack engineers, testing teams and vehicle engineers. Hiring each role separately, without considering how they will work together, can leave important gaps between teams.

Before writing job descriptions, leaders should map the battery decisions their company owns. Who sets specifications? Who signs off on test results? Who investigates failures? The answers reveal where internal expertise is essential.

Think Beyond Development

It is easy to focus the first hiring plan on engineers building the product. But a battery team also needs people who can help make the design repeatable in production and understand how it performs after vehicles reach customers.

A supplier quality specialist, for example, can help assess whether components consistently meet requirements. A testing and validation engineer can identify issues before production scales. Field quality professionals can bring information from service teams back to engineering.

The exact team will vary, but these responsibilities should have clear owners. Leaving them until “later” can put pressure on the original engineering hires to cover work they were not recruited to do.

Decide Where Partners Can Help

Working with external specialists, testing facilities or suppliers can be practical, particularly when a company needs a narrow skill for a defined piece of work. The risk comes when too much knowledge sits outside the business.

If a supplier makes a critical recommendation, does someone in-house have enough expertise to evaluate it? If a battery issue appears in the field, who can bring the evidence together and decide what happens next?

Companies do not need to employ every specialist permanently. They do need internal leaders who can ask the right questions and remain accountable for the product.

Hire in the Right Sequence

A hiring plan should follow the product roadmap. A company finalising its architecture may first need a senior battery leader who can define technical requirements and shape the team. As testing and production approach, validation, manufacturing and quality capabilities may become more urgent.

At SilverPeople, we help EV businesses turn these decisions into clearer hiring briefs. Instead of searching for every battery skill under one job title, we focus on the capabilities each role must bring and the work it must deliver.

The strongest battery team is not necessarily the biggest. It is the one with clear ownership of the decisions that matter most.

Read more »